本平台为互联网非涉密平台,严禁处理、传输国家秘密或工作秘密

基于热重的卷烟纸质量稳定性研究

Study on quality consistency of cigarette paper based on TGA technology

  • 摘要: 为研究卷烟纸的质量稳定性,跟踪某牌号卷烟35个月份的卷烟纸和烟丝的热重DTG曲线,引入标准均方根误差NRMSE(Normalized root mean squared error)计算不同样品DTG曲线中热解峰(400~625 K)和氧化峰(625~800 K)的差异度,并将NRMSE结合焦油和CO的释放量波动来评价卷烟纸的质量稳定性。结果表明:①此牌号卷烟焦油和CO的波动主要来自于卷烟纸的质量波动;②卷烟纸DTG曲线上热解峰NRMSE < 10%以及氧化峰NRMSE < 20%所对应卷烟的焦油和CO释放量接近,差值≤ 0.5 mg;③热解峰NRMSE>10%以及氧化峰NRMSE>20%时,氧化峰NRMSE对焦油和CO释放量呈显著性影响;④卷烟纸常规指标(定量,透气度,助剂含量,Na、K和Ca的含量)接近的卷烟纸样品,其热重DTG曲线依然存在较大的差异,并对焦油和CO的释放量造成明显的影响;⑤将某个月份卷烟纸的DTG曲线与标准卷烟纸的DTG曲线进行配对来预测焦油和CO的释放量,预测相对偏差均小于5%。

     

    Abstract: In order to study the quality consistency of cigarette paper, the DTG curves of cigarette paper and cut filler of a certain cigarette brand were analyzed for 35 consecutive months. NRMSE (Normalized root mean square error) was introduced to calculate the difference of pyrolysis peak (400-625 K) and combustion peak (625-800 K) in DTG curves of different cigarette samples, and the quality consistency of cigarette paper was evaluated by combining NRMSE with the fluctuation of tar and CO deliveries. The results showed that:1) The fluctuation of tar and CO deliveries of cigarette was mainly caused by the quality fluctuation of cigarette paper. 2) When the NRMSE of cigarette paper DTG curve was less than 10% in the pyrolysis peak and less than 20% in the combustion peak, the corresponding tar and CO deliveries had the least difference value of ≤ 0.5 mg. 3) When the NRMSE of cigarette paper DTG curve was higher than 10% in the pyrolysis peak and higher than 20% in the combustion peak, the deliveries of tar and CO were significantly affected by the NRMSE of combustion peak. 4) It was possible that the cigarette paper of similar specifications (grammage, permeability and contents of additive, Na, K and Ca) produced quite different DTG curves and varying tar and CO deliveries. 5) Predicting tar and CO deliveries by pairing DTG curves of cigarette paper in a given month with the DTG curve of the standard cigarette paper, the relative deviation of prediction was less than 5%.

     

/

返回文章
返回