本平台为互联网非涉密平台,严禁处理、传输国家秘密或工作秘密

应用动态水分吸附法比较不同烟丝解湿过程的差异

Analyzing dehumidification process of different cut tobacco by dynamic moisture adsorption

  • 摘要: 为比较不同烟丝解湿过程的差异,应用SPSx动态水分吸附仪分析了不同原料烟丝在干燥解湿过程中含水率变化差异,考察了烟丝质量对含水率变化率和平衡时间的影响;对10种烟丝干燥解湿过程中含水率变化曲线进行了数学拟合,量化比较了不同烟丝间的差异。结果表明:①烟丝质量对含水率变化率和平衡时间均有影响,优化确定的SPSx动态水分分析仪适宜的烟丝质量为0.8 g;②烟丝在干燥解湿过程中的含水率变化曲线可用非线性指数方程进行拟合;拟合方程解析和推导结果显示,在实验范围内,不同类型烟丝的理论平衡含水率高低顺序为烤烟>白肋烟>晒黄烟;③与烟叶部位相比,烤烟产地对理论平衡含水率的影响更加显著;④烟丝失水比例的平均变化速率大小顺序为白肋烟>晒黄烟>烤烟;相对于产地,烤烟部位对失水比例的平均变化速率影响较显著,下部烟叶比中部和上部烟叶变化快,而中部与上部烟叶差异不显著。

     

    Abstract: In order to compare the differences of dehumidification of different tobacco strands, an SPSx dynamic moisture adsorption analyzer (SPSx) was used to study the moisture uptake and adsorption variations of different cut tobacco during drying and dehumidification. The influences of tobacco weight on moisture variation rate and equilibrium time were investigated. Mathematical fitting was conducted on the moisture variation curves obtained from 10 varieties of cut tobacco during drying and dehumidification, and the differences were quantitatively compared. The results showed that: 1) Both moisture variation rate and equilibrium time were influenced by tobacco weight, and the optimized tobacco weight determined by SPSx was 0.8 g. 2) The moisture variation curves could be fitted with a nonlinear exponential equation. The analysis and deduction of the fitting equations suggested that the different types of cut tobacco studied in the order of the theoretical equilibrium moisture content were flue-cured tobacco > burley tobacco > yellow sun-cured tobacco. 3) Compared with leaf stalk position, growing area influenced the theoretical equilibrium moisture contents of flue-cured tobacco more significantly. 4) The different types of cut tobacco in the order of the average variation rate of moisture loss ratio were burley tobacco > yellow sun-cured tobacco > flue-cured tobacco. Compared with growing area, leaf stalk position influenced the average variation rate of moisture loss ratio more significantly. The variation rates of lower leaves were higher than those of middle and upper leaves, while the difference between the middle and upper leaves was not significant.

     

/

返回文章
返回