本平台为互联网非涉密平台,严禁处理、传输国家秘密或工作秘密

基于CRITIC赋权法的卷烟保润性能综合评价方法建立与应用

Establishment and application of a comprehensive method for evaluating cigarette moisture retention performance based on CRITIC weighting approach

  • 摘要: 为更全面且客观地评价卷烟的保润性能,选取10种代表性卷烟作为研究对象,综合利用低场核磁共振及气相色谱仪等分析手段分别对烟丝平衡含水率、水分结合形态、全烟气水分及烟丝干燥速率常数(k值)等关系卷烟保润性能的指标进行分析,并基于CRITIC赋权法计算各项指标客观权重系数,构建卷烟保润性能综合评价方法。结果表明:①不同品牌成品卷烟的烟丝平衡含水率有显著差异,介于11.67%~13.17%之间;烟丝中水分主要以结构水形态存在,对应T21峰积分面积占比均超过88%;各样品全烟气含水量为8.358~12.330 mg/g;不同卷烟烟丝的干燥速率常数存在差异,介于0.289 5~0.376 1之间。②基于CRITIC赋权法构建了基于4项指标的卷烟保润性能综合评价方法,其中4项指标烟丝含水率、结构水占比、全烟气水分、干燥速率常数的客观权重系数分别为0.168 4、0.214 7、0.308 9、0.308 1。③对代表性卷烟的保润性能进行综合评价,发现不同卷烟的保润性能综合得分介于61.78~97.90分之间,存在明显差异。本研究建立的基于卷烟4项指标的保润性能综合评价方法,可有效反映不同品牌卷烟保润性能的客观差异,可为卷烟保润性能综合评价提供可靠评价方法。

     

    Abstract: To evaluate the moisture retention performance of cigarettes more comprehensively and objectively, ten representative cigarette brands were selected for this research. Low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (LF-NMR) and gas chromatography (GC) were used to evaluate key indicators, such as the equilibrium moisture content and the drying rate constant (k value) of cut filler, the water-binding state and the total moisture content in the mainstream smoke. The CRITIC weighting approach was used to establish a comprehensive evaluation method for cigarette moisture retention performance, calculating objective weight coefficients for these indicators. The results showed that: 1) There were significant differences in equilibrium moisture content among the cigarette brands (11.67%-13.17%), with moisture predominantly existing as strongly bound water (T21 peak integration area proportion >88%). The total moisture content in mainstream smoke ranged from 8.358 to 12.330 mg/g, while the drying rate constant varied between 0.289 5 and 0.376 1. 2) The CRITIC-derived weight coefficients for the four indicators — equilibrium moisture content of cut filler, proportion of strongly bound water, total moisture in mainstream smoke and drying rate constant — were 0.168 4, 0.214 7, 0.308 9 and 0.308 1, respectively. 3) A comprehensive evaluation of the moisture retention performance of different cigarettes revealed that their comprehensive moisture retention performance scores ranged from 61.78 to 97.90 points, with significant differences. In summary, a comprehensive evaluation method based on four cigarette indicators was established, which effectively reflected the objective differences between the moisture retention performance of different brands of cigarettes, and thus providing a useful approach for evaluating the moisture retention performance of cigarettes comprehensively.

     

/

返回文章
返回