本平台为互联网非涉密平台,严禁处理、传输国家秘密或工作秘密

基于大体积热进样-柱内蒸发浓缩技术的鼻后呼出气溶胶成分分析

Analysis of post-nasal exhaled aerosol components based on large-volume thermal injection-in-column evaporation concentration

  • 摘要: 为明晰吸烟者鼻后呼出的气溶胶成分,开发了一种基于大体积进样‒柱内蒸发浓缩技术的鼻后呼出气溶胶成分分析方法。采用新设计的鼻后呼出气溶胶捕集装置,通过优化方法参数,对烤烟型和混合型卷烟吸烟者鼻后呼出的气溶胶成分进行分析;同时,在吸烟机上模拟吸烟者的实际抽吸曲线进行抽吸,模拟吸入气溶胶成分的释放量,并与鼻后呼出气溶胶成分进行对比。结果表明:①在鼻后呼出气溶胶中共检出158种化学成分,相对标准偏差(RSD)均小于15%,其中,100种成分的RSD小于10%。②对于烤烟型和混合型卷烟,大循环鼻后呼出气溶胶成分的释放量均显著低于小循环呼出气溶胶,大循环各类别成分的气溶胶平均截留率相差不大,小循环不同类别成分的平均截留率差异明显。③抽吸烤烟型和混合型卷烟时,吸烟者个体间的气溶胶截留率差异较小,抽吸行为导致的截留率差异更为显著。

     

    Abstract: To characterize the composition of post-nasal exhaled aerosols (PEAs) in smokers, an analytical method based on large-volume thermal injection-in-column evaporation concentration was developed. Utilizing a newly designed PEA collection device and optimized parameters, the aerosol components exhaled by smokers of flue-cured and blended cigarettes were analyzed. Concurrently, a smoking machine was employed to simulate actual human puffing profiles to quantify the release levels of inhaled aerosols, which were then compared with the PEA components. The results showed that: 1) A total of 158 chemical components were detected in the PEAs, with relative standard deviations (RSDs) all below 15%, and 100 of these components exhibited RSDs below 10%. 2) For both flue-cured and blended cigarettes, the release levels of aerosol components in retro-haling PEAs were significantly lower than those in inhalation PEAs. While the average retention rates across different chemical categories showed minimal variation during inhalation, significant disparities were observed among categories during retro-haling. 3) During the consumption of both cigarette types, inter-individual variations in aerosol retention rates were relatively small. In contrast, differences in retention rates driven by specific smoking behaviors were more pronounced.

     

/

返回文章
返回