本平台为互联网非涉密平台,严禁处理、传输国家秘密或工作秘密

压实法与抽空法装箱方式对烟丝质量的影响比较

Effects of Case Filling by Compressing Means and Suction Means on Quality of Packed Cut Tobacco

  • 摘要: 为了优化箱式储丝工艺,对比了传统压实法与抽空法装箱方式对储存过程中烟丝物理质量、烟气指标及感官质量的影响。结果表明:①与传统压实法装箱方式相比,抽空法装箱方式对烟丝产生造碎相对较小,且储存时间对烟丝的结构影响不明显,整丝率最大可降低0.24%;②两种方式装箱后,烟丝填充值随储存时间的增加均略有下降,但抽空法装箱并储存一定时间后烟丝填充值仍高于压实法;烟丝含水率随储存时间的增加变化不大;③抽空法装箱后,不同储丝时间对烟气指标基本无影响,感官评吸结果表明,抽空后存储9 d内的试验样品其感官质量较对照样无明显差异。

     

    Abstract: For optimizing the technics of storing cut tobacco in cases,the traditional means of case filling by compressing was compared with filling by suction in terms of the physical index of packed cut tobacco and the smoke index and sensory quality of cigarette.The results showed that:1) Comparing with traditional compressing means,the suction means produced lower tobacco breakage,did not affect cut tobacco structure obviously during storage,and the reduction of long strands portion was less than 0.24%.2) With the prolongation of storage time,the moisture content changed a little in cut tobacco packed by either means,the filling power of cut tobacco decreased slightly,however,the filling power of cut tobacco packed by suction means was always higher than that by compressing means.3) For cut tobacco packed by suction means,storage time basically did not affect smoke index,the results of sensory evaluation indicated that there was no obvious sensory quality difference between the test samples stored for 9 days and the control.

     

/

返回文章
返回