本平台为互联网非涉密平台,严禁处理、传输国家秘密或工作秘密

气压式与光学式滤棒圆周控制系统的对比分析

Comparison Between Pneumatic and Optical Circumference Control Systems in Filter Rod Maker

  • 摘要: 为研究光学式和气压式滤棒圆周控制系统的控制精度、稳定性和抗干扰等方面的差异性,分析了两种控制系统的工作原理和控制方式,并采用相同规格丝束在两种控制系统的设备上生产同一规格的滤棒进行取样测试比较。结果表明:使用光学式和气压式滤棒圆周控制系统的设备所生产滤棒圆周样本均值分别是24.1019和24.0962 mm,样本标准差分别是0.0310和0.0504 mm,短期过程能力指数分别是3.22和1.99,长期过程能力指数分别是3.20和1.96。在实际生产中,光学式圆周控制系统在控制精度、响应速度、稳定性、抗干扰能力等方面均比气压式圆周控制系统要好。

     

    Abstract: The optical and pneumatic filter rod circumference control systems were compared in terms of control accuracy, stability and resistance to disturbance, their working principles and control means were analyzed. The comparison was carried out separately on filter rod makers with optical and pneumatic control system to produce filter rods with tow both of the same specifications, and the produced filter rods were sampled and tested. The results showed that:the mean circumference of the samples produced by filter rod makers with optical control system was 24.1019 mm and that with pneumatic control system was 24.0962 mm, their standard deviations were of 0.0310 and 0.0504 mm, the short-term process capability indexes of 3.22 and 1.99, and the long-term capability indexes of 3.20 and 1.96, respectively. It indicated that optical circumference control system has the advantages over pneumatic control system in terms of control accuracy, response speed, stability, and resistance to disturbance.

     

/

返回文章
返回